Hi Paul,
>
> I recently came across a bug in the process code. Enclosed is a diff
> for process.c against the original 3.1.1 version. Unfortunately I
> don't have time to check it against 3.99.?. Nevertheless, I hope
> this fix will be useful. I imagine it will be trivial to incorporate
> it into 3.99.
As Grant told in his response, this bug has been corrected an
processes seem correct (at least on a 3.99.4 running Linux). The
Changelog I have seem to tell me that this is exactly the same bug.
Anyway thanks for your help.
> On another note, a big THANK YOU to Erick for all his work on STk.
> Our company has just released a product which uses STk for the
> user interface. In all, it has about 30,000 lines of STk source --
> a testament to the power and quality of STk.
>
> (For anyone who is interested, a description can be found at:
> http://www.grammatech.com/products/codesurfer/codesurfer.html)
>
Waou, I'm impressed. I have looked at the page and I'm very happy that
you were able to realize this project with the help of STk.
-- Erick
Received on Tue Mar 09 1999 - 21:38:34 CET