Hi Paul,
I have already responded to this message but since my home box had
some sendmail problems (but who doesn't have problems with
sendmail? ;-) I permit myself to resend you it.
Regards
-- Erick
Here was my old email:
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:36:14 +0100
Resent-Message-ID: <"TN_mhB.A.YrG.VWQ-2"_at_kaolin.unice.fr>
Resent-From: stk_at_kaolin.unice.fr
Resent-Sender: stk-request_at_kaolin.unice.fr
From: Erick Gallesio <eg_at_kaolin.unice.fr>
Sender: eg_at_kaolin.unice.fr
To: Paul Anderson <paul_at_grammatech.com>
Cc: stk_at_kaolin.unice.fr
Subject: Re: STk-3.99.4 on Win32.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:19:45 +0100 (CET)
Paul Anderson writes:
>
> I have encountered a number of problems with Stk-3.99.4 on Win32.
> They seem to be mostly fairly easy to fix, and I have started
> doing so. Does anyone else have a list of outstanding Win32 problems?
>
>
> I also have a couple of minor fixes on the Unix side regarding
> make install.libs.
>
> Do you have a schedule for releasing 4.0? If it's not too
> soon I could try and get these to you by then.
Yes I HAD one, but t is a long time that it is expired ;-)
Since, I will not package a new version for now because I'm too busy
(and I have learn from the past it is better to wait a quiet period
for releasing).
If you have some patch to provide, I would be glad to integrate them
for the next release.
Thanks by advance.
>
> Paul.
>
> P.S. Also, I have ported the process module to Win32. I'll pass
> that on too.
That's really a good news. I suppose that you are really too modest
here and what you call a port is rather a complete rewrite since the
semantic of processes seems very different between those OS's.
I suppose that a lot of Win32 user will be happy to use your code.
Thanks again.
-- Erick
Received on Sun Apr 18 1999 - 17:12:53 CEST