>Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 10:31:20 -0400 (EDT)
>From: <eg_at_unice.fr>
>I can see three ways to make STklos static:
> - the simpler way consists to hardcode it in STk (but #ifdef'ed with
> USE_STKLOS to allow it's exclusion if needed).
> Advantages: simpler to install
> STklos will be in libstk.a
> Inconvenient: make the interpreter bigger (~ 25 on SunOs, probably
> less on Linux)
The slight increase in size wouldn't trouble me, and the greater
simplicity is very attractive.
--
T. Kurt Bond, tkb_at_wvlink.mpl.com
Received on Wed Apr 17 1996 - 02:59:50 CEST