>>>>> Kelly Murray <MurrayKelly_at_ACMSystems.com> writes:
> How many people are using STk ??
Good question - I would be interested in knowing also.
STk is definitely my favorite Scheme inmplementation.
Between the FFI and the CLOS implementation it really provides
almost everything that I look for in a production language. I do
have a coworker that isn't fond of STk because of its habit of
reporting an error on line x of your code when the actual problem
is to found much deeper down in a library.
I told him to just not write code with errors.
While I have been known to MzScheme and SCSH once in a while,
I really use STk for nearly everything. I wrote a nifty FFI for
gdbm and I use STk with large gdbm databases. I wrote a nice CGI
lib and html lib that use heavily. Example:
(define foo (make html-doc
:title "Software Archive"
:bg-color "#f5deb3"
:addr "dtillman_at_ozarkaircraftsystems.com"))
(add-child (center (h2 "Software Archive")) foo)
(define table (make html-table
:border "0"))
(add-child (tr (list (th "Filename" :bg-color "#ccccff")
(th "Description" :bg-color "#ccccff")
(th "Supported" :bg-color "#ccccff"))) table)
;;;<More stuff, deleted>
(add-child "<CENTER>" foo)
(add-child table foo)
(add-child "</CENTER>" foo)
(add-child "<BR><BR><HR>" foo)
(output foo)
So, I have various table objects and so forth that can be children
of the html-doc object. The table objects can possess children
also, ad infinitum.
> The mailing list sure is quiet.
Yes it is. I do not know whether there are few subscribers
or whether there few people have STk questions.
> kelly
-Peace
-Dave
--
How absolute the knave is!
We must speak by the card, or equivocation will undo us.
Received on Sat Nov 11 2000 - 19:27:26 CET